in Agriculture, Economics, Uncategorized

Incentives Matter: A Proposal to Speed up Academic Publishing

Publishing in an academic journal is a long and grueling process. But much of the length of time is spent simply waiting for reviewers – who are volunteer and unpaid – to do the hard work of determining contribution and quality of the submitted manuscript.

**Edited: Thanks to @FarmerHayek and @AparnaHowlader for pointing me to Trevon Logan’s original tweet-proposal about up-or-down decisions.

Last week @TrevonDLogan proposed that editors commit to up-or-down decisions after one round of reviews. This would definitely speed up the publishing process by curtailing the time involved in multiple rounds of review.

My proposal piggyback’s this idea, but it attacks a different cause of the publication delay.

Because reviewers are unpaid, the task almost always goes to the bottom of their to-do list. I am the worst. Generally, an article review doesn’t even get on my to-do list until the editor has nudged me twice. I know, I’m a terrible person.

A Proposal

Get incentives aligned and grease the wheels with money.

  1. Charge a submission fee of $900 for each manuscript
  2. Pay three reviewers $300 each for submitting a well considered review within 14 days
    1. If the review is late, no $300
    2. Perhaps refund the $300 to the author since the premise of the submission fee is a quick review

Problem solved. Aggregate costs are zero, since everyone who submits a paper need only review three articles to make up the submission fee, which they are currently expected to do for free anyway.

I think this is enough money to get an article review onto most professor’s to-do list.

The biggest hurdle is what to do about brand new assistant professors who don’t usually have a lot of money but will have 3 papers to submit within the first year. In this case, departments have a couple of options. If the new professor has a start-up package, they could use these funds. If they don’t, the department could pay the submission fee, to be paid back by the professor after they do three reviews


  • David Ortega
  • AAEA
  • Joel Wood
  • Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega
  • Jayson Lusk
  • Per Bylund
  • William J. Luther
  • Rebecca Boehm
  • Sean Fox
  • Mark Koyama
  • Noel Johnson
  • Levi Russell 📈


  • Remy Z. Levin
  • Stan O.
  • Joel Wood
  • Trevon D Logan
  • Mindy Mallory
  • Mindy Mallory

Leave a Reply for Prachi Cancel Reply

Write a Comment



  1. I know some finance journals charge relatively high submission fees, $250 to $500. Reviewers paid. Does it help speed up their process? I would hope so. I think one journal shames reviewers by posting their turnaround time. That might be effective!

  2. My limited experience has been not a huge difference between economics and finance turnarounds, but that’s based only on a very limited sample.

  3. I think it would totally be appropriate to give veto power to the editor. If they think the review was not made in good faith, no payment. Perhaps with potential to appeal to the editorial board to prevent abusive or discriminatory editors.

  4. Great Idea, will the old gaurd accept it?? From my dealings with Econ profs I simply cannot see this happening… now is there a business opportunity here? Absolutely!

  5. $900 dollars is quite a lot of money for an academician from developing nation. And the institutes also don’t have alot of research funds which can be used for this purpose.

  6. Journals could publish editors’ selection of reviewers aggregated across a year. Then, obvious funneling of money to friends could be spotted. Would that be enough to preserve blind review?

  7. I hope so. Thank you for clarification. Hmm I am also thinking if journals can give some incentives to authors for acceptance of article. Then it will be a win-win situation for both authors and reviewers !

  8. Some top finance journals operate on a high submission fee/high referee payment model. JFE has a $750 submission fee and $350 + 1/3 off a future submission for an on time report, for example.


  • CWAE AAEA mentioned this article on

  • Daniel Ddiba liked this article on

  • Remy Z. Levin mentioned this article on

  • Dr Emma Yhnell 🔬 liked this article on

  • Stan O. mentioned this article on

  • Dr Keith H Coble liked this article on

  • David Ortega liked this article on

  • David Ortega reposted this article on

  • Matt Holt liked this article on

  • Matthew Elliott liked this article on

  • Mario Veneziani liked this article on

  • MD TAJUDDIN KHAN liked this article on

  • C-FARE liked this article on

  • AAEA reposted this article on

  • Miguel López liked this article on

  • Prachi liked this article on

  • Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega liked this article on

  • Joel Wood reposted this article on

  • Think tanks often pay $500-$1000 for timely reviews and it works.

  • Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega reposted this article on

  • Jayson Lusk reposted this article on

  • Per Bylund reposted this article on

  • joseph_mcphail liked this article on

  • William J. Luther reposted this article on

  • Tyler Mark liked this article on

  • Rajib Sarkar liked this article on

  • prior probability liked this article on

  • Rebecca Boehm reposted this article on

  • Jeffrey Savage liked this article on

  • Peter Isztin liked this article on

  • Mark Koyama liked this article on

  • Sean Fox reposted this article on

  • Mark Koyama reposted this article on

  • Noel Johnson liked this article on

  • Julia Hudson liked this article on

  • Anna Josephson liked this article on

  • Noel Johnson reposted this article on

  • Jonathan Eyer liked this article on

  • I know some finance journals charge high submission fees, $250 to $500. Does it help speed up their process?

  • Mindy Mallory mentioned this article on

  • Mindy Mallory mentioned this article on

  • Tymur Shyshlov liked this article on

  • CWAE AAEA reposted this article on

  • Levi Russell 📈 reposted this article on